Re: [Madness Writers] read this

why do people always use the word "fully" when describing stats? i
bet most couldn't "fully" describe the word's "full" meaning. just a
filler word with no value, thats how i see it.

fully one third? really not 33.59% or 33.61%, eh?

and that author in the last paragraph, so helmets are a fashion
statement huh? i will say, anything approaching 25mph is fuckin fast,
i dont care if its a bike, a sled, skiing, rollerskating, even
running. if a kid is approaching those speeds, u need a helmet.
common sense.

and if ur kid thinks helmets are gay, well thats fine with me.
Charlie approves of this message "he's fuckin retardedly gay"

whatever, not even a cohesive article.

and when her/his/its kid runs into a bump and flies off and lands on
his head, dont come cryin to the ER room.

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Madness <nayrrizdaed@gmail.com> wrote:
> so after reading this, I see no valid argument for not wearing a helmet. I'm
> not saying you should, but where's the argument?  This author fails.
> http://www.slate.com/id/2279817/pagenum/all/
>
> --
> Posted By Madness to Madness Writers at 1/04/2011 03:59:00 PM