yeah, boston had a lot more O in OT osmehow. Id say from watching OT1 they were on par wit hChicago, at best.
they had a few breakaways (or what should have been breakaways but the Boston guys held on too long for no reason)
one chicago guy was IN THE HIGH SLOT WIDE OPEN WIT HTHE PUCK and fucking passes it near boards. the 6 guys watching at the rink with me were all going crazy. even we dont do that man.
i didnt even wanna watcH OT1, but stayed. after that, we all left. was getting late. no internet, couldnt watch it. sucks man. ognna watch the highlights.
i scored a breakaway in real hockey. screamed "MIDDLE!" and shot up ice, best guy in the league hesitated, passed it to the LW, i was RW), it went through a bunch of skates free to the O zone, im behind D, grab it, dangle a few times lookin at net, shortside. no idea how it got through the goalie. must have went armpit. didnt look like any opening.
earlier in the game i was on a breakaway, far right though, didndt have much of a shot. shoot it, hits the post/outside goal to behind net. I was flying. was off balance and tried to stop, couldnt, and slammed into the boards pretty hard. helmet fell off, they whistled play dead. oh well. but my right hand bottom thumb hurts pretty good. cant put much pressure on it.
ill write more after watching these highluights.,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Madness <nayrrizdaed@gmail.com> wrote:
I watched the highlights of the chicago game this morning. What a game. Boston sucks. Watching the highlights, you'd think boston was the better offensive team, especially in OT. I wouldnt' say that NHL.com purposely gave a biased perspective, but Jesus, every good scoring chance came from Boston.
--
Posted By Madness to Madness Writers at 6/13/2013 04:58:00 AM
No comments:
Post a Comment