never read bleacher reprot articles man.  worthless.

 

anyway, about that stamkos.crosby article.  :

 

"Stamkos is a good player on a bad team that would be bad without him. Crosby is a good player on a good team that would be good without him as they proved. So neither are that valuable to either squad really. If I had to choose I'd choose Stamkos. Pretty shitty article. "

no idea why anyone would take stamkos.  lets take a poll and see Points per game, and also points that contributed to a victory. c onsidering lightning suck, stamkops goals are less meaningful compared to crosby's.    i dont care about GWG.  pointless.  if you score at some poitn and your team wins, you contributed.  if you score and your team loses, Stammie, then it didnt erally matter if you scored or not.

and ill put it this way: crosby is a THIRD LINER.  the best player in the world is onm the third line...MAKING HIS TEAMMATES LOOK LIKE AT LEAST 2nd LINE FORWARDS, if not 1st liners some games.  case closed, stamklols.

concussion issues arent even a concern.  he had neck problems, undiagnosed for a while. crosby is good, unless he gets hit in teh head like any other NHLer.  no more ore less prone to a concuission.