that creature completely contradicts ME lore, plot, and really just says a lot of bullshit that *Does NOT make sense*.   

 

theres no foundation for the ending to make sense.  

 that leaked scrpt shows, the "correct" answer is to synthesize life, which causes Shepard's death, which according to the theory means he finally succumbs to indoctrination.  thats a contradiction.  and I'm gonna accept a script over any theory.

 

    there were supposed to be 7 different endings...depending on how well you scored , Earth could be saved or not, the mass relays could be saved or not, and you might have been able to be saved in the perfect game.  definitely was NOT the destruction option to stay alive. bioware didnt change the original ending..they said they would, but didnt...or it was very subtle.

 

now, if you're indoctrinatedif the relays are destroyed or not, or the earth is destroyed or not...  maybe thats why those things happen anyway with the Space magic choices (all three). but everything that creature says is a contradiction to the lore of 3 games.

 

im inclined to say, by the creatures admission shepard is the first of his kind in the Crucible, that its real. theres no reason to say that if he's tryin to indoc shepard. give him the options, and boom.  there's an option to bypass indoctrination? why would a creature with that kind of power even have that option? they would all turn to the same thing...success for the reapers...which in a sense they all do, but then one you take a breath.

 

and why make a special ending where you take a breath..WHEN THATS THE END OF THE GAME. dlc can never change that. 

 

---------------------------

people say Mass effect 2's ending was horrible.  i didnt stick around long enough to play.  the game play completely blows.   i just remember combat was a waste of time. just like ME3.

 

no matter how you look at it, its a huge failure of an ending.